The fresh questionnaire consisted of step three pieces. Part I integrated concerns away from socio-market studies (years, level of education, parity, familial earnings, job, most recent marital reputation, sexual activity, history of HPV inoculation, and you may reputation for abnormal cervical cancer testing).
Part II made up of 6 questions about the mark women that would be processed, age to begin with, volume, ages otherwise requirements to prevent from examination, and techniques out of tests. Just the members that has heard from HPV carry out go ahead so you can Part III and this analyzed information about HPV of its types of (oncogenic or low-oncogenic), function from sign and you may reduction.
Prior to the investigation, this new survey regarding area II and you can part III inside Thai adaptation have been contemplated, discussed, and you may modified until consensus certainly 20 boffins who had been all the gynecologic oncologists (particular have been article writers in other synchronous degree). The pros rated each of 19 inquiries just like the often ‘relevant’ or ‘not relevant’. The object-level Content Legitimacy Index (I-CVI) was computed for every goods, plus the Stuff Validity Directory (CVI) was calculated by taking the typical ratio regarding 14 questions about information about cervical cancer tumors assessment and you can 5 questions about HPV. The newest CVI was step one for elements of the latest questionnaire (S1 Desk). The latest reliability try looked at into the 31 female with the same characteristic since professionals. New Cronbach’ leader coefficients to the accuracy was basically 0.819 to possess understanding of cervical cancers evaluating and you can 0.907 for knowledge about HPV.
Studies range
Toward time of booked colposcopy, the analysis assistant provided information of the investigation for the feminine which came across introduction criteria. The women exactly who agreed to participate offered created told agree and you may replied the newest questionnaire separately by themselves before continuing in order to colposcopy.
Data built-up for it studies was socio-group studies (Area I of one’s survey), experience in cervical cancer evaluating (Area II), and you will expertise in HPV (Area III).
Mathematical analysis
The fresh new responses of knowledge regarding the cervical malignant tumors evaluation and HPV was analyzed of the for each product before rating categorization. Proper address try scored due to the fact 1 while ‘incorrect and you can not knowing answer’ try scored 0.
Off 14 issues out-of cervical cancer tumors tests, women whose rating have been ? 10 was in fact randomly classified because the which have ‘good knowledge’ or else was thought to be hvorfor elsker Cubansk kvinder hvide mГ¦nd with “not good education”. To have knowledge of HPV, female whose respond to is ‘never ever heard of HPV’ was omitted from the investigation away from HPV studies.
From 5 inquiries, feminine whose score have been ? step 3 had been thought to be that have ‘a great knowledge of HPV’ otherwise once the ‘not-good knowledge’. Regarding 19 inquiries, feminine whose rating was ? 13 was basically classified as the that have ‘a overall knowledge’ or else given that ‘not-good total knowledge’.
Most of the analysis was gathered into the an electronic databases and you may assessed playing with SPSS V.twenty six.0 (SPSS, Inc., Chi town, IL, USA). Descriptive statistics were utilized to analyze demographic analysis and you can was indeed described once the numbers which have commission, suggest which have practical departure otherwise average having diversity. The new association between per varying and you can knowledge get was in fact reviewed having fun with effortless linear regression. Exploratory model was created inside the multivariable research plus all of the details possibly about the info get. The newest felt amount of mathematical importance are good p-property value 0.05 or shorter.
Efficiency
Out of 500 women who met inclusion criteria and were invited to the study, one ong 499 women who responded to the questionnaire about knowledge of cervical cancer and screening (part II) and knowledge about HPV (part II), two did not provide personal information. So demographic data were available in only 497 women (Table 1). The mean age of 497 participants was years (SD ± ). More than half of the participants were aged
